Partager sur :

Mystery Surrounds the Death of Three Women in Belize: Was Carbon Monoxide Poisoning the Cause?

đź“Ť Geneva, Switzerland

{Part Two: Gas and Inconsistencies in Official Reports}

 

A Comprehensive Analysis of the Hypotheses of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning, Overdose, and Evidence Tampering {Royal Kahal: San Pedro, Belize}.Kaoutar Naqqad , Imane Mallah , Wafae Elarar

 

Possible Causes and Contributing Factors

Several theories have been proposed to explain the deaths of the women, with each theory presenting a set of potential contributing factors supported by evidence.

1. Carbon Monoxide (CO) Poisoning

Mechanism of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning:

• Malfunctioning Gas Water Heater: Ventilation issues, incomplete combustion, or a blocked exhaust system in the resort’s instant water heaters could have led to carbon monoxide leakage into the living space, increasing the risk of poisoning.

• VRF Air Conditioning System Limitations: Since these systems recirculate indoor air without introducing sufficient fresh air, any carbon monoxide leakage could have been trapped within the suite, amplifying health risks.

• Possible Malfunction of CO Detectors: While all suites were reportedly equipped with carbon monoxide detectors, no alarms were recorded. This raises concerns about a potential technical failure, maintenance neglect, or improper installation of the device.

 

The Effects of Carbon Monoxide Inhalation: Symptoms and Complications

When carbon monoxide (CO) is inhaled in a closed room, it replaces oxygen in the bloodstream by binding to hemoglobin, leading to hypoxia in tissues and organs. This can result in loss of consciousness and, at high concentrations, death.

Does Foam Come Out of the Mouth?

Carbon monoxide poisoning can sometimes cause foamy discharge from the mouth in severe fatal cases. This may occur due to pulmonary edema (fluid accumulation in the lungs).

 

2. Supporting Evidence

• Visible Symptoms: Initial reports mentioned the presence of foam at the mouth, a common sign of acute poisoning or seizures. Later, this was described as vomiting, raising suspicions of an attempt to downplay the severity of the condition.

• Autopsy Findings: Preliminary examinations revealed pulmonary edema (fluid accumulation in the lungs), which aligns with carbon monoxide poisoning. No external injuries were reported, supporting the hypothesis of exposure to an invisible toxic gas.

• Environmental Considerations: The suite’s location on the ground floor, combined with gas-powered water heaters and a VRF air conditioning system, may have created a sealed environment that allowed carbon monoxide to accumulate undetected.


3. Drug or Alcohol Overdose

Local investigators proposed that the victims died due to a combination of alcohol consumption and “gelatin-based edibles.” Initial reports explicitly mentioned “alcohol and gelatin edibles,” but later revisions referred only to “alcohol.” However, the victims’ families and friends strongly refuted this theory, citing their deeply religious beliefs and responsible lifestyles, casting doubt on this explanation.

4. Evidence Tampering and Possible Cover-up

Some observers have raised the possibility of evidence tampering or deliberate concealment, despite no clear indications of forced entry or theft. Suspicion arose due to:

• Suspicious Cleaning Procedures: Unofficial reports suggest that resort staff or authorities may have intervened quickly to clean the scene, further obscuring the circumstances surrounding the deaths.

• Inconsistencies in Official Statements: Police narratives fluctuated between accidental poisoning and substance misuse, while descriptions of symptoms were altered, raising concerns about potential evidence manipulation.

• Possible Authorities’ Involvement: Allegations surfaced regarding collusion between local police and resort management, given their close ties to influential figures in the region. This has fueled suspicions of crucial evidence being withheld.

5. Timeline and Evolution of Narratives

Understanding the sequence of events is crucial to assessing conflicting theories and identifying potential discrepancies.

Saturday, February 22, 2025 (Around 12:00 PM):

• Victims Discovered: After approximately 36 hours of no communication, resort staff unlocked the suite’s door. Early media reports labeled it as “Suite 101,” though evidence suggests it was actually Suite 102.

• The three women were found unresponsive, and their deaths were later confirmed.

6. Immediate Consequences and Official Reports

• Initial Police Statement: Authorities quickly attributed the deaths to an “overdose” of alcohol and gelatin-based edibles.

• Altered Description of Symptoms: The term “foam at the mouth” was changed to “vomiting” in official reports, prompting questions about transparency.

• Family and Community Objections: The victims’ families strongly rejected the overdose theory, pointing to their religious lifestyles and the likelihood of carbon monoxide poisoning or resort infrastructure negligence.

• Fire Department Involvement: On February 24, 2025, the Belize Fire Department conducted limited carbon monoxide testing. However, they lacked the necessary tools to conclusively determine gas levels, leaving many questions unanswered.

7: Evidence and Areas of Concern

1. Victims’ Profiles and Backgrounds

•    Kaoutar Naqqad, Imane Mallah , and Wafae Elarar were devout Muslim women from Revere, Massachusetts.

2. Direct Evidence

• Gas Water Heater: A potential source of carbon monoxide, yet it was not mentioned in police reports.

• VRF Air Conditioning System: Recirculates indoor air, which could trap carbon monoxide in the event of a leak.

• Carbon Monoxide Detectors: The resort claims they were installed, but no alarm was triggered at the time of the incident.

• Hotel Management and Local Authorities: Quickly classified the incident as an “overdose,” disregarding evidence pointing to potential infrastructure failure.

3. Official Oversight

• Belize Fire Department: Lacked specialized equipment to test for carbon monoxide, leaving key questions unanswered.

• Government Influence: The resort is linked to influential figures, including the Prime Minister, who endorsed its designation as a “certified establishment.” Some argue that the government may be reluctant to conduct a thorough investigation due to concerns about the negative impact on Belize’s tourism industry.

Broader Context and Suspicions of a Cover-up

1. Tourism-Related Motives

Belize’s economy heavily relies on tourism, and a major incident at a prominent resort could have severe economic repercussions. As a result, local authorities may prefer to attribute the deaths to a drug or alcohol overdose rather than acknowledge a systemic failure in safety standards. This approach helps protect the resort’s reputation and maintain investor confidence.

2. Altered Details and Evidence Manipulation

• Modification of Symptom Descriptions: The official narrative changed from “foam at the mouth” to “vomiting.” Additionally, initial references to “snacks/gelatin-based edibles” were later reduced to just “alcohol.”

• Inconsistencies in Suite Number: Reports conflicted on whether the incident occurred in Suite 101 or 102. Furthermore, floor plans were later removed from online sources, raising suspicions of an attempt to obscure key details.

3. Systemic Weaknesses

• Lack of Resources: Local police and fire services lack the necessary equipment and expertise to conduct a comprehensive investigation into carbon monoxide poisoning.

• Political and Economic Pressures: Since tourism is a cornerstone of Belize’s economy, political interests may take precedence over transparency. The close ties between the resort’s management and local decision-makers further fuel concerns about a potential cover-up.

Proposed Actions for a Transparent Investigation

1. Professional Carbon Monoxide (CO) Testing

• Engaging Forensic HVAC Experts: An external specialized team should inspect the suite’s gas water heater, exhaust vents, and VRF air conditioning system.

• Comprehensive System Evaluation: Testing should be conducted across all similar suites to ensure the risk is not isolated to just one unit.

2. Transparency in Toxicology and Autopsy Reports

• Full Disclosure of Autopsy Reports: Findings should be made public, with a focus on carboxyhemoglobin levels.

• Independent Toxicology Analysis: International forensic experts should re-examine the samples to restore public confidence.

3. Verification of Carbon Monoxide Detector Records

• Maintenance and Functionality Audit: All CO detectors should be reviewed to confirm regular maintenance and proper placement.

• Reinstallation and Calibration: Devices should be replaced or recalibrated if any malfunctions are detected.

4. Independent Oversight

• International Criminal Investigation: External experts or U.S. authorities should be involved to ensure an unbiased review.

• Third-Party Audit: An independent auditing body should oversee the findings to guarantee transparency.

5. Clarification of Suite Number and Incident Details

• Official Statement from Resort Management: A clear explanation should be provided regarding the discrepancy between Suite 101 and Suite 102.

• Standardized Media Reports: Local authorities must clarify initial conflicting statements to regain public trust.

 

Part Seven {Continued}.

 

For more details on the case, please visit:

https://maglor.fr/mre/carbon-monoxide-gas-claims-lives-three-tourists-royal-kahal-resort-kaoutar-naqqad-imane-mallah

Français
Partager sur :